COVID-19: NATIONAL SECURITY THREAT
Some sources have identified the first report of COVID-19, “a novel virus,” as early as November 7, 2019 in the city of Wuhan, in the Hubei Province, a group of eight cities in the central mainland of China that is the largest urban center in that region, currently transitioning from an industrial base to technology, and a few national leaders are beginning to question to what extent the Chinese government has been less than forthcoming on basic facts about their experience with this contagion, the government which reporters at Vox claimed to have acted swiftly and decisively to contain and control a biological agent that is now, paradoxically, a pandemic crisis, and was so even at the time that reporter wrote the cognitively dissonant story.
On April 2, 2020, our campaign filed a petition for injunction and declaratory judgment action in the City of Alexandria Court to enjoin Ralph Northam’s executive order that was issued under the pretext of a public health crisis, which, must, under the United States Supreme Court rulings in Planned Parenthood of Southeastern Pennsylvania v. Casey, as well as Whole Women’s Healthcare v. Hellerstedt, is subject to the same controlling rules that prevented the Texas legislature from creating health regulations that might create an undue burden, restricting a women’s access to having an abortion, and we are all supposed to play by the same rules, in genocidal holocaust of abortion, or pandemic crisis.
Bottom line: COVID-19, a “novel virus,” is not proliferating under a conventional paradigm that can be predicted by rules of science and mathematical probability, but rather under rules that define tactical and strategic engagement.
COVID-19 PROLIFERATION FACTS: ACCIDENTAL TOURIST
On January 20, 2020, a predictive analysis report was prepared by MosLabs, which reasonably predicted that, in the event the contagion spread from the largest city in the central mainland of China, infected persons would escape by airline travel and spread the contagion to other locations. Making a list of the top 15 destinations, the analysis concluded that COVID-19 would, based upon a normalized standard distribution curve, more likely than not, find its most devastating consequences in Hong Kong or Bangkok. However, in the narrative of the report, both they, and WHO, which relied upon that report and included it as the last footnote in thier preliminary report, dated January 23, 2020, they discussed, as perfectly normal the prevailing narrative regarding its spread to South Korea, of particular strategic significance, Iran, with whom South Korea began trade relations in 2016, and Italy. Inquiries to WHO to explain this discrepancy have found no reply.
Intelligence Assessment: No biological agent engages in evasive tactics that 1) find evolutionary pressure to exact devastating damage on only one province in a nation with over a billion people, and 2) no biological agent infects, in sufficient critical mass, passengers bound for destinations to which the majority of travelers in an airport are not going.
COVID-19 PRESENTATION FACTS: A “NOVEL VIRUS”
Viruses were first discovered, independently, in 1892 and 1898, in research on disease in animals, and still much is unknown about the most abundant biological particle in nature, with even debate amongst the scientific community, especially over the last two decades about what is definitive science on virology.
Nonetheless, by 2013, ten years after the Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome (SARS) virus first appeared in Hong Kong, there were only 219 viruses that were known to be harmful to man, in any way, shape or form. By laws of probability and evolution, this suggests a relatively stable condition, subject to the Newtonian analogy of the laws of inertia, and supporting a reasonable inference that absent interference from man, a new harmful virus to man will not occur without human intervention, and, coincidentally, COVID-19, produces similar effects on human subjects, and possesses similar characteristics to the SARS virus.
And, PJ Media has recently reported that even though the bat species that has been attributed to the introduction of the COVID-19 virus to the Wuhan Province is not a naturally occuring species in that region of China, but was found to have been used in research in nearby laboraties, and, apparently, a bat or bats, somehow escaped.
Intelligence Assessment: Scientist in China must at least concede that they have inadequate security protocols at their research laboratories.
Nothing to Fear But Fear Itself: Social Distancing explained as a threat to liberty and resolution of the pandemic crisis.
The Shipping News: Extrapolation analysis from the “cruise line cases,” specifically the Diamond Princess, examanined by the CDC, and the recent incident involving the Zaandam, as applied to land based dwellings with the same restricting characteristics, like apartments, high rise condominiums, nursing care facilities and elderly communities.